This week in class we participated in an activity called Skyscraper. For this activity students are given a grid with numbers along the outside (see example below) and a handful of unit snap cubes. The purpose of the game is to fill the grid with stacks of cubes, each of which represents a building. The buildings must be placed in a way that each number on the outside of the grid represents the number of buildings (or stacks of cubes) someone standing there would be able to see. Similar to the game Sudoku, each column and row must have one each of each building height.
![]() |
Solution to Example Grid |
When we first were given the activity, the rules of the game
were not explicitly given to us. We
almost immediately began the activity, with our facilitator Amy only quickly
giving us a brief explanation. These
limited instructions and examples resulted in almost the entire class misinterpreting the rules of the game.
Instead of thinking that the outside numbers represented the number of buildings (or stacks) we can see, we
were under the impression that the numbers represented the number of floors (or blocks) we could see. This led to confusion and frustration when
trying to solve the problem. Amy walked
around the room, giving hints to certain groups (for example, she told us that
it is similar to Sudoku). However
this initial miscommunication of the rules of the game caused a lot of problems
when trying to solve the problem.
![]() |
Misinterpretation (how many floors you see):
Front = 3; Back = 3
Correct (how many
buildings you see):
Front = 1; Back = 2 |
![]() | |
Misinterpretation
(how many floors you see):
Front = 3; Back = 3
Correct (how many
buildings you see):
Front = 3; Back = 1 |
![]() |
Misinterpretation (how many floors you see):
Front = 3; Back = 3
Correct (how many
buildings you see):
Front = 2; Back = 2 |
Initially for this activity, I was going to discuss the importance of being clear with the instructions you give to your students so they are fully aware of
what is expected of them. However, after
reflecting on the activity in its entirety, I believe that the purpose of this
activity was to experience the many different mathematical processes, as well
as realizing the importance of letting students discover and construct their
own learning. If we were given the full
and correct rules of the game, less mathematical processing would have
occurred.
![]() |
(image created by Lindsey Crawford) |
Reasoning and
Proving
Through misinterpreting the rules of the game, we were able to
reason with each other and prove why either the rules given to us were
incorrect, the grid numbers were impossible, or there was something else we
were missing. For example, I proved that
with using the incorrect rules it would be impossible for numbers opposite to each
other on the grid to be different.
This is because no matter which side of the buildings you are standing
on (front or back) you will still see the same number of floors (or blocks). This started to get us thinking that maybe we
misunderstood the rules.
Communicating
Through
discussing with my peers as well as the teacher, we were able to realize that
the rules of the game were misinterpreted.
When Amy communicated to my group the hint about Sudoku, we were able to problem solve and realize the correct rules
of the game. Once we determined that the numbers represented the number of buildings we could see as opposed to the number of floors, we solved the problem together, communicating our ideas and reasoning. When we determined where a stack of blocks
would go, we would explain our reasoning to the other members in order to prove
that it is correct, as well as contribute to our whole group's understanding.
Connecting
Connecting occurred in this activity
through relating the rules of the game to a game that most of us would likely
be very familiar with, i.e. Sudoku. Making
this connection assisted in our understanding that each row and column should
have one of each sized building.
Connecting mathematics to previous experiences is very efficient for
furthering one's understanding of a new problem and helping with one's approach
to problem solving.
Reflecting
After completing a puzzle, we would look
at the solution making sure it was correct.
We looked at all the numbers to ensure they accurately described how
many buildings we could see. We also made
sure that each row and column had one of each building height. This reflection of our solution would help us
find any mistakes we may have made.
Reflecting is an important step in solving math problems. When you reach an answer to a problem, it is
important to reflect on it and make sure your answer makes sense before dubbing
it your final answer.
Other mathematical processes occurred during this activity,
but these four were the most prevalent in my opinion. I realized many different things during the
activity about being a math teacher. One
thing I learned is that as a math teacher, it is important to sometimes simply
step back from the problem and let students problem solve on their own or with
their peers. Discovering mathematics is
the best way to truly understand and appreciate it. I also learned that the final result of a
math problem is not nearly as important as how you got there. The mathematical processes that occur
during the problem solving and the discovering of mathematics are most
important.
Hi Lindsey!
ReplyDeleteI also felt the same way about this activity at first. It was difficult to proceed with the problem since we did not know exactly how to solve this activity. Using the incorrect rules, we found contradictions and it was at that point that we realized there must be a different way to solve the problem. With small hints from our facilitator, we were able to figure out exactly how to complete this puzzle. I really like how you explained your experience through some of the mathematical processes. It shows exactly how you worked through the problem and demonstrates how important the processes are when presented with a new problem.
Laura
Lindsey,
ReplyDeleteI would like to start by saying how much I enjoy the look of your blog. Your use of images made your post interesting and easy to follow. You also explain your ideas very clearly which made it easy to feel a connection to your words. As I was going through the Skyscraper exercise, I too was very confused at the beginning but I was able to use social collaboration and problem solving skills to eventually work through the activity. I really appreciate your discussion about the mathematical processes as I admittedly did not consider them during my own problem solving experience. I was focused on the role of the instructor in terms of the instructions not being given that I did not make the connection. Reflecting now, I see that there were many levels of problem solving to the exercise.
I look forward to hearing more of your thoughts as we progress through our course together.
Shannon